3 years ago418By Joel Rosenblatt and Chris Dolmetsch | Bloomberg
Amazon.com Inc. says Parler LLC isn’t only dangerous to law and order in the nation’s capital, but to the tech giant’s own staff.
To justify to a judge why it suspended web-hosting service for the conservative social media site, Amazon executives cited threats by Parler users to delivery drivers and staff at the e-commerce giant — as well as concern that Parler failed to police violent content both before and after the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol.
A showdown looms Thursday in Seattle federal court over Parler’s complaint that Amazon’s action is a politically loaded attack on an upstart’s efforts to compete with social media behemoths Twitter and Facebook. But even as Parler cries foul that the loss of web-hosting service threatens its very existence, Amazon said Parler didn’t honor their contract.
“It was Parler who breached the agreement, by hosting content advocating violence and failing to timely take that content down,” AWS said in the filing.
Two unidentified Amazon executives submitted statements in court filings about Parler users “posting threats of physical violence to Amazon delivery drivers, Amazon facilities, and Amazon executives.” They each wrote: “As a result of these threats and similar threats against employees of other companies that have suspended Parler or others from their services, I am concerned for my safety, as well as the safety of my colleagues.”
Amazon started investigating violent threats on Parler in November and reported more than 100 pieces of content over the next seven weeks, but the site never took action, according to one executive. After the events at the Capitol, Amazon “notified Parler of additional content that threatened or encouraged violence” and emphasized the need to take such posts down, the executive said.
Parler responded by proposing to have volunteers identify content that would be forwarded to a “jury” to decide whether it should be taken down, the executive said. Amazon said that the company’s chief executive officer had stated publicly that Parler would do “as little content moderation as possible” and that there was an up-tick in violent threats on the site.
“We explained that given the events at the U.S. Capitol Building and the threats regarding the upcoming inauguration, we had real concern about this content leading to more violence,” the Amazon executive said, adding that the company doubted Parler’s response would be effective.
What Bloomberg Intelligence Says
Related Articles
Trump on verge of 2nd impeachment after Capitol siegeFacebook tracking a rise in violent rhetoric tied to U.S. presidential inauguration‘Insurrection,’ ‘coup’ and ‘sedition.’ Here’s what each term meansTrump’s Republican wall eroding ahead of impeachment voteOlympic gold medal swimmer reportedly part of U.S. Capitol riot“Amazon likely has little to fear from the antitrust lawsuit filed by Parler after AWS suspended its contract with the social-media company. The complaint, alleging a concerted refusal to deal, lacks basic facts that must be plead to sustain such claims. The dispute is a commercial one, if anything, yet Parler’s breach of contract claims seem weak too.”— Jennifer Rie, Senior Litigation Analyst
David J. Groesbeck, a Spokane, Washington-based lawyer representing Parler, had no immediate comment Tuesday evening. AWS is by far the largest cloud-computing provider, and its on-demand software services are the backbone for many of the most popular internet services. Parler has ”no other options” to be on the web, it said in the suit.
The case is Parler LLC v. Amazon Web Services Inc., 21-cv-00031, U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington.
For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com
©2021 Bloomberg L.P.
English (US)